[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-h m produces conflicting key binding descriptions
From: |
Ehud Karni |
Subject: |
Re: C-h m produces conflicting key binding descriptions |
Date: |
Sat, 3 May 2003 22:12:12 +0300 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 03 May 2003 08:55:18 -0700, Ami Fischman <usenet@fischman.org> wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, what is the meaning of a nil meta-prefix-char?
> Is it just that only ESC then gives meta- meaning (and not alt or any other
> key)? The docstring for the variable doesn't mention this explicitly.
When I set meta-prefix-char to nil and do (global-set-key [M-foo] 'bar)
than the global map shows <nil> foo --> bar. The ONLY key combination
that will execute this `bar' command is the META key + foo (together).
Ehud.
- --
Ehud Karni Tel: +972-3-7966-561 /"\
Mivtach - Simon Fax: +972-3-7966-667 \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Insurance agencies (USA) voice mail and X Against HTML Mail
http://www.mvs.co.il FAX: 1-815-5509341 / \
mailto:ehud@unix.mvs.co.il Better Safe Than Sorry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: use http://www.keyserver.net/ to get my key (and others)
iD8DBQE+tBSMLFvTvpjqOY0RApxjAJwOeECEzmXe/QgC+KpedlRRXZbZ0gCeIO0+
Ey3AssBgPVhVHg+fxBKSjiE=
=zXLa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----