[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnuplot vs. emacs' compile command
From: |
Hans-Bernhard Broeker |
Subject: |
Re: gnuplot vs. emacs' compile command |
Date: |
Tue, 20 May 2003 14:16:54 +0200 (MET DST) |
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
>
> |> I'll see if it helps to have gnuplot_x11 fclose(stderr) as it
> |> enters the -persist state.
>
> freopen to /dev/null might be preferrable, so that stderr remains valid.
Yep, that seems like a better plan --- gnuplot_x11 can be built to
optionally output execution trace information to stderr, which had better
not break completely.
I tried both, and both apparently do the trick. Unless someone on the
gnuplot development list has an objection, this change to gnuplot will
be checked in.
--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.