Re: sh-script mode does not understand printf

[Kevin Rodgers]

Kevin Rodgers wrote:

> Glenn Morris wrote:
> > That's an awkward one, because (AFAICS) sh-script.el doesn't know
> > anything about ksh93. "ksh" is assumed to be ksh88. Do you think ksh88
> > and ksh93 differ significantly enough for it to be worth adding code
> > for ksh93 to sh-script? Is "ksh" these days more likely to be ksh88 or
> > ksh93?
>
> That's a good question.  The folks on comp.unix.shell would say ksh93 
> (which
> does have a lot of new features I'm just now learning about), but Sun e.g.
> still distributes ksh88.  What do the major GNU/Linux distributions 
> provide?
>
> http://kornshell.com/
> http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/

Oops, I meant to include a link to their (non-free) software license:


http://www.research.att.com/sw/license/ast-open.html

--
Kevin Rodgers