[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:36:46 -0500 |
> It would not be consistent to call a symbol whose names is ...-hook
> as a function.
Yes, as I said, but I believe you approved it.
I believe I approved running that symbol as a normal hook.
That is how it should work. The incorrect usage of defining
this symbol as a function never worked. We should just fix the
incorrect usage.
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, (continued)
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/09
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/01/09
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/11
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/01/12
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/15
- Message not available
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/16
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/16
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Simon Josefsson, 2004/01/16
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/16
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/12
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Dave Love, 2004/01/15
- Re: the ...-unload-hook convention doesn't work, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/16