[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 23:42:31 -0500 |
Personally, I don't think it's very funny humour. When one calls MS-DOS
"MS-DOG" or MS-Windows "windoze", one is holding in contempt not only the
sleazy marketing types at Microsoft, but also the programmers who wrote
these systems.
They are all working on non-free software. And making lots of money
for it. I don't feel much compassion for them.
I am speculating here, but I would think these programmers suffer a good
deal more from MS's business practices than mere users.
If they feel really bad, they could quit.
- Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Reuben Thomas, 2004/01/17
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/18
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/01/19
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation,
Richard Stallman <=
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Barry Margolin, 2004/01/20
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/20
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, David Kastrup, 2004/01/20
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Sam Steingold, 2004/01/20
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Barry Margolin, 2004/01/20