[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries
From: |
Harald Maier |
Subject: |
Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:30:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il> writes:
>> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:38:33 -0500
>>
>> We could make a 21.4 release from the release branch.
>> That might be a good idea anyway.
>
> I agree. IIRC, 21.3 had a couple of annoying last-minute bugs.
Hello Eli,
I am not sure if I took the right version (EMACS_21_1_RC), but if this
is the current RC branch, then the patch for the discussed problem is
_not_ in the branch. Please, let me know the right RC tag if I'm wrong
and then I will double check again.
Harald
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, (continued)
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/14
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/16
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/16
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/17
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/17
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/17
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/17
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries,
Harald Maier <=
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Jason Rumney, 2004/02/18
- Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/18
Re: [h-e-w] Current word on binaries, Harald Maier, 2004/02/14