[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: describe-char-after vs. Unicode
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: describe-char-after vs. Unicode |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:05:16 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <871wwdgi67.fsf@jidanni.org>, Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
writes:
> (Might have reported already.)
> All I know is for Unicode char
> ā ā ā
> describe-char-after says a lot,
> character: ā (05140, 2656, 0xa60)
The latest CVS version shows this line instead.
character: ā (2656, #o5140, #xa60, U+0101)
---
Kenichi Handa
handa@m17n.org