[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: frames vs. weak hash tables and garbage collection |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:42:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
() Joe Wells <jbw@macs.hw.ac.uk>
() Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:15:00 +0100
With the above definition, I still get (reproduce-bug) returning
((#<dead frame emacs@localhost.localdomain 0xa2ae808> . t))
instead of nil.
crazy idea... have you tried doing this experiment under ratpoison?
for the record:
$ ratpoison.working-2007-05-04 --version
ratpoison 1.4.2-CVS (built May 4 2007 11:37:01)
$ emacs --version
GNU Emacs 22.0.97.4
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GNU Emacs comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You may redistribute copies of Emacs
under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING.
$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 516616 419580 97036 0 80808 187968
-/+ buffers/cache: 150804 365812
Swap: 1510068 0 1510068
i recall emacs21 had weak-hash problems, but i think those were
fixed in emacs22. such problems when hacking EDB were one reason
i transitioned away from being an emacs21 holdout (about two years
ago).
thi