[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:52:14 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:41:56 +0000
> From: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
> CC: Bill Meier <wmeier@newsguy.com>, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Yes, but yours is a bug report, not a request for enhancement.
> >
> Is it? I didn't see any report of problems caused by the file timestamp
> being the time of install.
Someone complained in the past that the current copying with "cp"
sometimes causes a warning from Emacs that a .el file is newer than
the corresponding .elc file. We fixed that by copying *.elc files
first, then the *.el files, but that's a kludge, and it doesn't really
make sure that the warning will not come back on some very fast
filesystem.
- [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs, Bill Meier, 2008/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs, Bill Meier, 2008/01/18
- Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/01/18
- Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/01/18
- Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs, Jason Rumney, 2008/01/18
- Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs, Jason Rumney, 2008/01/19
- Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs, Bill Meier, 2008/01/19
- Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/01/19