Re: nesting of unwind-protect and atomic-change-group

[Stefan Monnier]

> When combining unwind-protect and atomic-change-group I found that
> putting unwind-protect outermost worked for me (i.e., an unwindform
> moving point to the buffer location where the error occured was
> obeyed), whereas doing it the other way round didn't work for me
> (the unwindform was ignored). 

I'm pretty sure the unwind form is not ignored.  Maybe the unwind form
you tried happened to do something that's undone by the
atomic-change-group undoing of buffer changes?
Maybe this is even a bug in atomic-change-group.
So please spell out your test case,


        Stefan
.