bug#537: Emacs makes inferior-scheme and inferior-lisp hang when...

[Kjetil S. Matheussen]

On Sun, 6 Jul 2008, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> And it also seem like a hash needs to be placed on
> the line after:
>
> (define (add a b)
>   (+ a
>     b))
> #!
> This is a guile comment
> !#

A small test showed that this is probably not the case.
The hash doesn't seem to make a difference, it was
probably just a coincidense that made me think so.
Unfortunately, I'm not able to make 100%
reproducable scheme.