bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 16:36, Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am surprised to see that .dx64fsl is on completion-ignored-extensions
> while .dx32fsl is not.
>
> '.dx32fsl' is produced by 32 bit clozure-cl¹. So I'd propose to add it
> to the list.

Apparently, OpenMCL / Clozure uses different extensions for fasl
according to target architecture:

http://ccl.clozure.com/ccl-documentation.html#building-definitions

The attached patch adds them all, though I think they're a bit too
much. Any way to know which of these are commonly used?

    Juanma



Index: lisp/bindings.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/bindings.el,v
retrieving revision 1.225
diff -u -2 -r1.225 bindings.el
--- lisp/bindings.el    14 Sep 2009 23:28:43 -0000      1.225
+++ lisp/bindings.el    22 Sep 2009 13:43:44 -0000
@@ -602,7 +602,10 @@
         ;; CMUCL
         ".x86f" ".sparcf"
-         ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks, OpenMCL)
-         ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl" ".pfsl" ".dfsl"
-        ".p64fsl" ".d64fsl" ".dx64fsl"
+        ;; OpenMCL / Clozure CL
+        ".dfsl" ".pfsl" ".d64fsl" ".p64fsl" ".lx64fsl" ".lx32fsl"
+        ".dx64fsl" ".dx32fsl" ".fx64fsl" ".fx32fsl" ".sx64fsl"
+        ".sx32fsl" ".wx64fsl" ".wx32fsl"
+         ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks)
+         ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl"
         ;; Libtool
         ".lo" ".la"