[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5600: 23.1; etags don't tag (defvar foo) declaration
From: |
Francesco Potortì |
Subject: |
bug#5600: 23.1; etags don't tag (defvar foo) declaration |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:25:01 +0100 |
>It'd be good if etags didn't tag defvar declaration forms, only actual
>variable definitions.
Lisp_functions should distinguish between defvar and other (def*
constructs, and tag the former only if --declarations.
Would you consider a different patch that looks at the declarations
global variable and distinguishes among "(defvar" and other "(def"
contructs? Such a change would reuire to be reflected in the help
strings, the man page and the info docs.
I can do that myself, but I cannot guarantee a deadline earlier than
some weeks from now.
>I found the tripe-negative of while(!noninname) hard to follow and
>thought a skip_name() could be clearer.
I agree.