[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-too
From: |
Ted Phelps |
Subject: |
bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-toolkit=no |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:52:40 +1000 |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= writes:
> YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu skrev 2010-04-07 02.16:
> > FRAME_COL_TO_PIXEL_X and FRAME_LINE_TO_PIXEL_Y include the left and
> > top side internal border width, respectively. So, the internal border
> > is already counted twice in FRAME_TEXT_COLS_TO_PIXEL_WIDTH and
> > FRAME_TEXT_LINES_TO_PIXEL_HEIGHT above.
>
> Thanks for the clarification. One pixel is still missing though, I'll
> keep looking.
I've had a closer look and that last pixel is still there when:
pixelwidth = FRAME_TEXT_COLS_TO_PIXEL_WIDTH (f, cols);
pixelheight = FRAME_TEXT_LINES_TO_PIXEL_HEIGHT (f, rows);
In this case, there's a one pixel border around the left, bottom and
right edges of the frame. Hopefully this helps you with your search?
Or maybe this is the intended behavior? I'll see if I can upload a
screenshot...
Thanks,
-Ted
- bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-toolkit=no, (continued)
- bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-toolkit=no, Jan Djärv, 2010/04/07
- bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-toolkit=no,
Ted Phelps <=
- bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-toolkit=no, Jan Djärv, 2010/04/07
- bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-toolkit=no, Ted Phelps, 2010/04/07
- bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-toolkit=no, Jan Djärv, 2010/04/07
- bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-toolkit=no, Jan Djärv, 2010/04/07
- bug#5848: 23.1.95; bands of background after font change if --with-x-toolkit=no, Jan Djärv, 2010/04/07
Message not available
Message not available