[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:49:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> Sorry, I cannot take the time to try to pare things down to a single small
case.
> Suffice it to say that I have never run into the problem before Emacs 23. In
my
> case, this is about `fit-window-to-buffer' - that is where I see the problem.
So far I don't have the slightest idea what "the problem" is. I don't
even know which window gets deleted: The one showing the buffer whose
window shall be fit (in which case it would be interesting to know
whether the window shall be shrunk or enlarged), or another window.
>> If you have a one line window and an nine lines window in a ten
>> lines frame and you want to enlarge the nine lines window by one
>> line Emacs 23 will probably delete the one line window.
>
> That sounds like a bug - it contradicts the doc. Why shouldn't enlargement be
> prevented instead, in that case?
It's prevented in `adjust-window-trailing-edge'. For `enlarge-window'
there's no such rule. The latter's doc-string clearly states:
"This function can delete windows if they get too small."
martin
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, (continued)
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/14