[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:52:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> C-x C-x is the main way to activate an existing region in Transient
> Mark mode. To make that require C-u will be a different pain in the
> neck.
I wasn't present when the discussion to make `C-x C-x' do these things
took place, but it seems like the current behaviour conflates to rather
different actions -- exchange-point-and-mark, and activate-region. How
about just decoupling them altogether, and let `C-x C-x' revert to
(only) doing what it's always done, and add `C-x C-a' for
`activate-region'?
`C-u C-x C-x' could still do both at once, for people who like that a
lot.
> The change for C-d and DEL to delete all regions was too radically
> incompatible to make made without polling the users first. The right
> thing to do is take that change out, then address the issue the right
> way: by polling the users.
It sounds rather odd to have `C-d' not delete the active region. If
you (for instance) Shift-Right an area, and then press `DEL', I think
most people would expect the region you've just selected to be deleted.
So I think there are two completely separate issues here:
1) Should `C-x C-x' activate the region? I think not, because it drives
me totally insane.
2) Should `DEL' delete the active region? I think it makes sense, but
it might be too surprising. And `C-w' already exists to do that, so
there doesn't seem to be a really compelling reason for that
behaviour.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Richard Stallman, 2010/10/21
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/21
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Lennart Borgman, 2010/10/21
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Drew Adams, 2010/10/21
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Miles Bader, 2010/10/22
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/22
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Andreas Schwab, 2010/10/22
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/22
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/10/22
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Richard Stallman, 2010/10/23
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Richard Stallman, 2010/10/23
- bug#7260: 24.0.50; DEL screwed up, Jan Djärv, 2010/10/23