[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames' |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:41:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
What I'm interested in is a fix for this bug - in the next Emacs release.
Meanwhile we should restore the old behavior. Chong could
you please apply the attached patch.
martin
*** /lisp/dired.el 2010-11-10 10:58:50.000000000 +0100
--- /lisp/dired.el 2010-12-03 19:31:02.234375000 +0100
***************
*** 2757,2763 ****
;; that's possible. (Bug#1806)
(split-window-vertically))
;; Otherwise, try to split WINDOW sensibly.
! (split-window-sensibly window)))))
(pop-to-buffer (get-buffer-create buf)))
;; If dired-shrink-to-fit is t, make its window fit its contents.
(when dired-shrink-to-fit
--- 2757,2764 ----
;; that's possible. (Bug#1806)
(split-window-vertically))
;; Otherwise, try to split WINDOW sensibly.
! (split-window-sensibly window))))
! pop-up-frames)
(pop-to-buffer (get-buffer-create buf)))
;; If dired-shrink-to-fit is t, make its window fit its contents.
(when dired-shrink-to-fit
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Drew Adams, 2010/12/02
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', martin rudalics, 2010/12/02
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Drew Adams, 2010/12/02
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', martin rudalics, 2010/12/03
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Drew Adams, 2010/12/03
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', martin rudalics, 2010/12/03
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Drew Adams, 2010/12/03
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames',
martin rudalics <=
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Chong Yidong, 2010/12/04
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Drew Adams, 2010/12/16
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', martin rudalics, 2010/12/17
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Drew Adams, 2010/12/17
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', martin rudalics, 2010/12/17
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Drew Adams, 2010/12/17
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', martin rudalics, 2010/12/17
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Drew Adams, 2010/12/17
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Chong Yidong, 2010/12/21
- bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames', Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/03