[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#6877: Documentation: "till" vs "until" in docstrings
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: bug#6877: Documentation: "till" vs "until" in docstrings |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:51:08 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:10:02 -0400 MON KEY <monkey@sandpframing.com> wrote:
MK> While it is considered reasonable by many[1] to substitute "till" for
MK> "until" I don't see this as something to promote in the docs esp.
MK> when there is a negligible economy in using of "till" instead of "until":
Seconded. I am repeating some of MON KEY's arguments (more concisely, I
hope) but "till" is harder to parse (being a less common alternative to
"until") and has more meanings in English.
Also many programmers are familiar with "until" as a flow control
keyword so it's a more natural word for them.
Ted
- Re: bug#6877: Documentation: "till" vs "until" in docstrings,
Ted Zlatanov <=