[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:39:18 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:06:42 +0900 Daiki Ueno <ueno@unixuser.org> wrote:
DU> BTW, I forgot to mention in the previous response, I think it overkill
DU> to make epa-file to encrypt files with symmetric encryption by default,
DU> because as long as a file is visited in a buffer, epa-file remembers the
DU> last used encryption method (in epa-file-encrypt-to local variable),
DU> which will be used on the next save-buffer. So a user should see the
DU> key selection UI only the first time she saves the buffer.
DU> Default symmetric might be useful when Emacs does visit/save/kill-buffer
DU> repeatedly, but I think it is a rare case.
I agree. The user may not even know the implications of symmetric
encryption. So IMHO this should be an external option (maybe requested
by setting `epa-file-encrypt-to' to 'ask if it's nil) which would change
the current key selection UI as follows (this is a refinement of my
previous UI proposal):
1) show prompt "Do you want to encrypt %s with a passphrase (symmetric)
or with a specific key? (p/k/P/K/h)"
2) on `h', show some help, mentioning for instance that this question is
asked only once per file and link to the EPA manual
3) on `p', proceed without the key selection UI
4) on `k', proceed with the current key selection UI
5) on `P' or `K', save the choice as a new customized default for
`epa-file-encrypt-to'
All of this shouldn't involve auth-source.el beyond setting
`epa-file-encrypt-to' to 'ask if it's nil. That way other packages can
use this same approach.
So this inconveniences users at least once, but gives them a chance to
understand what's going on, and with `P' will not be asked again. What
do you think?
Ted
- bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, (continued)
bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/09
- bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/10
- bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/10
- Message not available
- Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/12/12
- Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/12/13
- bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Daiki Ueno, 2010/12/13
- bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Daiki Ueno, 2010/12/14
- Message not available
- Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Daiki Ueno, 2010/12/15
- bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Daiki Ueno, 2010/12/15
- bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Daiki Ueno, 2010/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/12/16
- Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/12/16
Message not availableRe: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/16
Re: bug#7487: 24.0.50; Gnus nnimap broken, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/16
Message not available