[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:26:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> No, as Martin mentioned, save-window-excursion is the macro to use if
> you want to write code that breaks in "odd" cases (sidenote:
> one-buffer-per-frame is one of those "odd" cases that tend to trigger
> bugs in code using save-window-excursion, so you probably "often" suffer
> from those things, like me).
`save-window-excursion' is the macro never to use. It should be used
exclusively for debugging and prototyping. Application programmers who
prefer to work with multiple frames themselves should know best and
avoid `save-window-excursion' like the plague. At least in "released"
code. Anything else is masochism.
martin
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, (continued)
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Sean Sieger, 2011/01/14
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Drew Adams, 2011/01/14
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Sean Sieger, 2011/01/14
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/14
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Sean Sieger, 2011/01/14
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/13
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Drew Adams, 2011/01/13
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Drew Adams, 2011/01/14
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/14
- bug#7728: 24.0.50; GDB backtrace from abort, Drew Adams, 2011/01/16