[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:27:20 -0800 |
> > Think of my argument as a question, if you like:
> > What is the policy wrt retitling?
>
> I think Glenn's arguments are entirely valid.
No one suggested otherwise.
> If there needs to be policy, Glenn is the first one we
> should ask, because he does most of the mundane work with
> the bug-tracker.
Fine. But bug tracking is for users as well as developers.
Please keep that in mind when setting the policy.
It is not only about who does the bug-tracking mundane work.
Or at least it should not be (IMHO).
> FWIW, I see no harm at all in retitling, and I do see a certain
> value in having the title express the essence of the bug report.
And do you see such a policy as the general practice elsewhere? What others do
elsewhere need not limit or guide us, but it can sometimes help to look over the
fence.
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Drew Adams, 2011/02/25
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Glenn Morris, 2011/02/25
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Drew Adams, 2011/02/25
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Glenn Morris, 2011/02/26
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Drew Adams, 2011/02/26
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/26
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/26
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Drew Adams, 2011/02/26
bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/26
bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Andreas Schwab, 2011/02/26