[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8664: Being more-systematic about user-interface timestamps
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#8664: Being more-systematic about user-interface timestamps |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2011 11:53:37 +0300 |
> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:26:06 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
>
> --- src/systime.h 2011-03-11 20:24:09 +0000
> +++ src/systime.h 2011-05-12 17:07:49 +0000
> @@ -30,6 +30,12 @@
> #endif
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef HAVE_X_WINDOWS
> +# include <X11/X.h>
> +#else
> +typedef unsigned long Time;
> +#endif
Wouldn't this clash with the typedef in w32gui.h?
> --- src/menu.c 2011-05-12 06:48:32 +0000
> +++ src/menu.c 2011-05-12 16:55:07 +0000
> @@ -1147,13 +1147,13 @@
> #else /* not HAVE_X_WINDOWS */
> Lisp_Object bar_window;
> enum scroll_bar_part part;
> - unsigned long time;
> + Time time;
> void (*mouse_position_hook) (struct frame **, int,
> Lisp_Object *,
> enum scroll_bar_part *,
> Lisp_Object *,
> Lisp_Object *,
> - unsigned long *) =
> + Time *) =
This needs a corresponding change in all the functions used as
mouse_position_hook on different platforms. You made such a change
only in 2 of them: term_mouse_position and XTmouse_position.