[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedica
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:53:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> I checked again, and the same test as before, with throw-three.el, does NOT
> work, i.e., the bug is still manifested. I tested again with both the
window.el
> you sent yesterday and with the latest window.el you sent. Both have the same
> problem.
>
> runemacs.exe -Q --debug-init -l "window-2011-06-21a-MARTIN.el" -l
> "throw-three.el" -f "1on1-emacs"
>
> runemacs.exe -Q --debug-init -l "window-2011-06-23a-MARTIN.el" -l
> "throw-three.el" -f "1on1-emacs"
>
> Same recipe: M-x f TAB o
>
> When I hit the second char (`o') I get the read-only error for *Completions*.
Note that apart from the
(load-file "c:/drews-lisp-20/hexrgb.el")
(load-file "c:/drews-lisp-20/fit-frame.el")
the throw-three.el you sent me contains
(load-file "c:/drews-lisp-20/window-2011-06-21a-MARTIN.el")
which contains the old definitions which don't work in your case. I
removed all three lines in my version.
Apart from that I can see the following:
If I do -f "1on1-emacs" from the command line I see the "bad" behavior.
But I see the same behavior if I do -f "1on1-emacs" with an old Emacs
that does NOT contain my changes. In both cases the *Completions* frame
is selected. So please verify that this invocation DTRT with an old
Emacs of yours.
If I omit -f "1on1-emacs" from the command line and evaluate the
expression (1on1-emacs) after my initial frame appeared I don't see the
bad behavior.
Please clarify these issues.
Thanks, martin.
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: `special-display-popup-frame' broken, (continued)
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/20
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/20
- Message not available
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/21
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/21
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/21
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/21
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/23
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/24
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/26
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/26