[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9912: valgrind warning in coding.c:coding_set_destination
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
bug#9912: valgrind warning in coding.c:coding_set_destination |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:38:50 +0900 |
In article <yxqy5w2f9c6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>, Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
writes:
> valgrind ./temacs
> produces this warning:
> ==30382== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==30382== at 0x636022: Fcall_process (callproc.c:799)
> ==30382== by 0x5D6C07: Ffuncall (eval.c:2956)
> ==30382== by 0x5D5ABB: Fapply (eval.c:2422)
> ==30382== by 0x5D6C07: Ffuncall (eval.c:2956)
> ==30382== by 0x622C5B: exec_byte_code (bytecode.c:785)
> ==30382== by 0x5D77BA: funcall_lambda (eval.c:3205)
> ==30382== by 0x5D6F4C: Ffuncall (eval.c:3023)
> ==30382== by 0x5D5ABB: Fapply (eval.c:2422)
> ==30382== by 0x5D6C07: Ffuncall (eval.c:2956)
> ==30382== by 0x622C5B: exec_byte_code (bytecode.c:785)
> ==30382== by 0x5D77BA: funcall_lambda (eval.c:3205)
> ==30382== by 0x5D6F4C: Ffuncall (eval.c:3023)
> It looks like struct coding_system.dst_multibyte needs to be
> initialized.
I fixed it. But as "valgrind ./temacs" segfaults in my
environment, I can't confirm the fix. Please check if the
fix is correct or not.
---
Kenichi Handa
handa@m17n.org
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#9912: valgrind warning in coding.c:coding_set_destination,
Kenichi Handa <=