[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (fals
From: |
jari |
Subject: |
bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive) |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:15:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On 2011-12-14 07:55, Ken Brown wrote:
| ...
| >> [Eli] or ask the maintainers of the platform to fix that either in the
| >> platform libraries or in platform-specific code in Emacs. I think
| >> that is the right way; adding a user option every time is not, IMNSHO.
| >>
| >> If native Windows and even MS-DOS ports can DTRT with this, then how
| >> come Cygwin cannot?
To recap:
- Cygwin can, but it needs special setup. This setup is not trivial:
if you intend to use same Windows Mapped Network Drive. If you use
mount(1), you lose Windows File Manager Integration because paths
are no longer the same.
- Emacs can't rely on UID, GID on Cygwin to be correct.
| >The MS-DOS port uses system-specific code in `check_writable' (see
| >fileio.c). I don't know whether the native Windows port DTRT for Jari's
| >network filesystem. Jari, can you test this?
Yes, Windows NT EMacs port works fine. No problems
- File on remote drive are not marked read-only
- File on remote drive are written without asking.
| As I understand it, this is a filesystem problem: Samba returns a
| fake SID to Windows, so Cygwin can't determine the correct uid/gid.
Yes.
| Jari, you were already told on the Cygwin list how to work around
| this problem. Why not just do it?
It's too complex, and doesn't work with multiple Samaba severs that
would use all different GID, UIDs for the same user name, and I cannot
get right UIDs and GIDs installed ... too many issues.
I can work just fine under Cygwin without these GID, UIDs set. But I
can't use Emacs effectively.
I would expect there to be at least an option to control these
pre-emptive confirmation questions. Without any control, the situation
is a nightmare.
Compare:
confirm-kill-emacs
dired-no-confirm
message-kill-buffer-on-exit
vc-suppress-confirm
...
Jari
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), (continued)
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/12/14
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Ken Brown, 2011/12/15
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Ken Brown, 2011/12/16
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/12/16
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Stefan Monnier, 2011/12/16
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Ken Brown, 2011/12/17
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive),
jari <=
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Ken Brown, 2011/12/14
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), jari, 2011/12/14
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/12/14
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Richard Stallman, 2011/12/14
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), jari, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Ken Brown, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), jari, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), jari, 2011/12/13
- bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive), Eli Zaretskii, 2011/12/13