[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpre
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:27:07 +0300 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:56:29 +0200
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 11657@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Stefan Monnier
> <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> > (BTW, we can remove subr.el from makefile-w32.in's
> > COMPILE_FIRST, since it's useless there).
>
> Done in revno:108612.
Thanks.
> BTW, why the differences between the makefile.in COMPILE_FIRST:
>
> COMPILE_FIRST = \
> ...
> $(lisp)/emacs-lisp/autoload.elc
>
> and the makefile.w32-in one?
>
> COMPILE_FIRST = \
> ...
> $(lisp)/progmodes/cc-mode.el \
> $(lisp)/progmodes/cc-vars.el
See revno 36919, where Gerd Moellmann added them both to
lisp/Makefile.in and lisp/makefile.w32-in.
I have no idea whether what the comment says about bootstrap is still
true nowadays, since the bootstrap on Windows works differently. You
can try removing those 2 files and see if that hurts anything.
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, (continued)
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/06/09
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/09
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/09
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/10
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/10
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/11
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/14
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/06/14
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/14
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/06/15
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/15
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Stefan Monnier, 2012/06/20
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/06/20
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/22
- bug#11657: 24.1.50; Byte compiler is a lot slower now, when run interpreted, Glenn Morris, 2012/06/24