|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | bug#16604: 24.3.50; False negatives in lisp-completion-at-point |
Date: | Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:24:54 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I guess it's true that if you choose among a list of completions (or > if you use completion cycling), the extra elements from obarray aren't > nearly as problematic as if you rely on just "plain completion". So maybe "merge" is indeed a better default than "in-turn". The behavior I'm looking for in completion-at-point should probably be obtained more along the lines of what is done in file-name completion where completion-ignored-extensions is used before calling try-completion. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |