[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18278: [PATCH] bug#18130: rmail.el: handle imaps, pops, and local so
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#18278: [PATCH] bug#18130: rmail.el: handle imaps, pops, and local source mailboxes (maildir, MH, etc.) |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:51:56 +0300 |
> From: Carlos Pita <carlosjosepita@gmail.com>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>, gray@gnu.org,
> bug-mailutils@gnu.org, 18278@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:46:08 -0300
>
> > So the only issue that bothers me here is: would the new code still
> > work with the old movemail, and how does the code detect whether it
> > invokes old or new one?
>
> please take into account that this is mainly a bug fix (see bug report
> #18130, which originated this new report and corresponding patch). It's
> not an improvement on or an enhancement of the "old movemail". Currently
> the emacs documentation on rmail states that it must work with the
> external movemail and that it must support additional protocols (by
> using this external tool). But both assertions are currently false. The
> rmail code already supports both movemail backends, indeed, but the
> support for the mailutils one is mostly broken.
Yes, I understand all that (I've read the patch). But I don't think a
bugfix necessarily avoids the danger of breaking backwards
compatibility, which is why I asked. I think my question still
stands.
- bug#18278: [PATCH] bug#18130: rmail.el: handle imaps, pops, and local source mailboxes (maildir, MH, etc.), Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/08
- bug#18278: [PATCH] bug#18130: rmail.el: handle imaps, pops, and local source mailboxes (maildir, MH, etc.), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/09
- bug#18278: [PATCH] bug#18130: rmail.el: handle imaps, pops, and local source mailboxes (maildir, MH, etc.), Carlos Pita, 2014/09/09
- bug#18278: [PATCH] bug#18130: rmail.el: handle imaps, pops, and local source mailboxes (maildir, MH, etc.),
Eli Zaretskii <=