bug#18478: [Patch] Mention the return value of `clone-indirect-buffer'

[Tom Willemse]

Hey Drew,

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

>> I've attached a suggestion for mentioning the return value for
>> `clone-indirect-buffer'. Please let me know what you think.
>
> Looks OK to me.  You can also simplify it to just "Returns...".

Certainly, if that has your preference. I just thought that because it
is a new paragraph and the ones before it talk about the meanings of the
arguments it would be clearer to explicitly state it's about the
function.

I actually would have liked to start the docstring off with "Create and
return ..." as the docstring for `clone-buffer' does, but checkdoc then
started complaining about the line being more than 80 characters long.