[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#21885: 24.5; Transposing things with a negative argument
From: |
Eli Barzilay |
Subject: |
bug#21885: 24.5; Transposing things with a negative argument |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:12:07 -0500 |
In the past (IIRC, up to around v24.3) transposing things (chars,
words, sexprs, lines) would always leave the point after the
transposed thing. This means that I could always use a `C--' prefix
to "drag" the current thing backwards in the same way that the default
action drags it forwards. This is no longer happenning.
After a few trials the thing that seems to fix it is adding this line
at the end of the `transpose-subr' definition:
(goto-char (+ (car pos2) (- (cdr pos1) (car pos1))))
To be clear, this is not a backward incompatible change -- it fixes
the *current* incompatible change.
Patch file attached.
0001-Fix-transpose-subr-with-a-negative-argument.patch
Description: Binary data
--
((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
- bug#21885: 24.5; Transposing things with a negative argument,
Eli Barzilay <=