[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:19:47 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Evening, Artur.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 04:38:37PM +0000, Artur Malabarba wrote:
> > + (mapc 'byte-compile-form (cdr form))
> Use #' instead of ' please. ☺
:-). That wasn't my bit of code, I just had to reindent it. It dates
from a time before using #' became fashionable. Maybe there's something
to be said for replacing all such uses (or which there are 15) in the
file.
On a more serious note, given how there's potential for `funcall' to
segfault (without my latest proposed fix), perhaps I should go through
the entire byte compiler checking for similar occurrences.
On another note, I've managed to byte compile elpa, and there are indeed
three occurrences of bad `setq's, like you said. There were
byte-compiler errors (which aborted the compilation) in packages elcs,
and rudel-mode, so there just might be more in there.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, (continued)
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Drew Adams, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, John Wiegley, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, John Mastro, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Johan Bockgård, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Andreas Schwab, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Nicolas Richard, 2015/11/25