[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Nov 2015 21:19:42 +0200 |
> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:08:41 -0800 (PST)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: 22043@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Isn't it correct and sufficient to say that non-regexp
> incrementalsearch uses character folding by default?
No, because "C-s RET" actually invokes a regexp search behind the
user's back when character folding or lax-whitespace are in effect,
and the user has no way of knowing whether it invoked a regexp or
non-regexp search.
> IOW, isn't this default behavior true for all incremental
> search commands except regexp search, and only for those
> commands (no non-incremental search commands)?
No. Nonincremental vs incremental is not the issue. The issue is
whether the search function that the command employs uses regexps or
not. It is a limitation of how these features are implemented that
they absolutely require regexp search.
- bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding, Mike Kupfer, 2015/11/28
- bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/29
- bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding, Mike Kupfer, 2015/11/29
- bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/30
- bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/30
- bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding, Mike Kupfer, 2015/11/30
- bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/30
- bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/29
- bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/29