bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers

[Noam Postavsky]

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Why not take the bytecode _entirely_ out of the backtrace buffer?
> Is it ever any use?

It can be disassembled, and may hold useful information that would
otherwise be missing.

>
> I proposed a week ago to print bytecode functions differently,
> without showing the bytecode.

I think it might make sense to hide the bytecode with display
properties, but keep the text itself so that it's not lost when copied
to an email.