[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00e
From: |
Clément Pit--Claudel |
Subject: |
bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014). |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:44:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
On 2016-12-18 14:52, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: 21028@debbugs.gnu.org
>> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pit@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:04:09 -0500
>>
>>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21028#98
>>>
>>> Did you try that? What were the results?
>>
>> Sorry, I missed that message.
>>
>> It works! But only for the original example (with Arial), AFAICT. Do you
>> know what the equivalent fix would be for the recipe given in
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21028#62 ?
>
> The same: use :family and :registry instead of :name. What did you
> try?
I tried this, but it was didn't seem to make a difference:
(dolist (frame (frame-list))
(dolist (fontset (fontset-list))
(set-fontset-font fontset 'unicode (font-spec :family "Segoe UI Emoji"
:registry "iso10646-1") frame 'append)
(set-fontset-font fontset 'unicode (font-spec :family "XITS Math":registry
"iso10646-1") frame 'append)))
(setq-default prettify-symbols-alist '(("=>" . 8658) (":=" . 8796)))
> And why does that example use 'format', but without any format spec?
It was a leftover from the code that I started from when trying to construct a
minimal example.
Clément
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/18
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/18
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/18
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/18
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014).,
Clément Pit--Claudel <=
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/19
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/19
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/19
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/19
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/19
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/19
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/22
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/22
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/22
- bug#21028: Performance regression in revision af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac (Apr 2014)., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/22