[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression
From: |
Michal Nazarewicz |
Subject: |
bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:38:57 +0200 |
On Thu, Mar 30 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 26274@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:00:27 +0200
>>
>> > Starting from a fresh checkout like Eli suggested is the safest way,
>> > but I guess you should be able to get around this error by deleting
>> > 'Makefile', and regenerating it by running ./configure again.
>>
>> Thanks, I went this route, and it worked (and still took almost an hour
>> to go through eight iterations). Git bisect in fact pinpointed this
>> commit:
>>
>> 5ec3a58462e99533ea5200de356302181d634d0b is the first bad commit
>> commit 5ec3a58462e99533ea5200de356302181d634d0b
>> Author: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>> Date: Mon Sep 19 00:23:40 2016 +0200
>>
>> Generate upcase and downcase tables from Unicode data (bug#24603)
>>
>> Use Unicode data to generate case tables instead of mostly repeating
>> them in lisp code. Do that in a way which maps ‘Dz’ (and similar)
>> digraph to ‘dz’ when down- and ‘DZ’ when upcasing.
>>
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?msg=89;bug=24603 lists all
>> changes to syntax table and case tables introduced by this commit.
>>
>> * lisp/international/characters.el: Remove case-pairs defined with
>> explicit Lisp code and instead use Unicode character properties.
>>
>> * test/src/casefiddle-tests.el (casefiddle-tests--characters,
>> casefiddle-tests-casing): Update test cases which are now working
>> as they should.
>>
>> (When Eli listed this as a candidate, I doubted it because of the date,
>> since my build from February 8 of this year does not have the problem.
>> I guess that date is not the commit date. Confusing when looking at the
>> commit log.)
You can do ‘git show --format=fuller 5ec3a58462e99533ea520’ to see
commit date but even that can be rather misleading.
> The commit date is Feb 15. This commit came from a feature branch, so
> the date you see in the log I show is the original commit date on that
> branch.
>
> Michal, could you please take a look at this?
Strangely I cannot reproduce it. I’ve run ‘emacs -Q’, executed
(custom-set-variables
'(completion-category-overrides
(quote ((buffer (styles substring))
(file (styles substring)))))
'(read-buffer-completion-ignore-case t)
'(read-file-name-completion-ignore-case t))
and with atest, Atest, ätest, Ätest, testä and testÄ files in the
directory I get the following completions:
| Typed | Completions |
|-------+-------------------------------------|
| test | atest Atest ätest Ätest testä testÄ |
|-------+-------------------------------------|
| atest | atest Atest |
| Atest | atest Atest |
| ätest | ätest Ätest |
| Ätest | ätest Ätest |
|-------+-------------------------------------|
| testa | NOTHING |
| testA | NOTHING |
| testä | testä testÄ |
| testÄ | testä testÄ |
which is what is expected.
GNU Emacs 26.0.50 (build 3, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) of 2017-03-21 build
from ffbb4684999 (I think) + patchset (I think). I’ll rebase and try
again with fresher version.
--
Best regards
ミハウ “𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪86” ナザレヴイツ
«If at first you don’t succeed, give up skydiving»
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Stephen Berman, 2017/03/27
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Stephen Berman, 2017/03/27
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Stephen Berman, 2017/03/29
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Noam Postavsky, 2017/03/29
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Stephen Berman, 2017/03/29
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/29
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression,
Michal Nazarewicz <=
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Michal Nazarewicz, 2017/03/30
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Michal Nazarewicz, 2017/03/30
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Michal Nazarewicz, 2017/03/30
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Stephen Berman, 2017/03/30
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Michal Nazarewicz, 2017/03/30
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Stephen Berman, 2017/03/30
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/30
- bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression, Noam Postavsky, 2017/03/29