bug#27979: tab completion for "(yes or no)?"

[Tino Calancha]

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017, Tino Calancha wrote:

> On Sun, 6 Aug 2017, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "TC" == Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com> writes:
> > TC> offering TAB completion would somehow contradict this idiom.
> >
> > Well I discovered for a second and subsequent yes, one can just hit the up 
> > arrow.
> What?? Oh noo!
> > (But I hope that is not now going to be removed too, now that I revealed 
> > it.)
My comment above (What?? Oh noo!) was just a joke.  It's perfectly 
fine that you use the arrows to repeat a previous answer.  That must work 
in almost every situation.