[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Oct 2017 23:23:55 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/56.0 |
On 10/23/17 11:12 PM, Juri Linkov wrote:
It's a step backward: it removes the ability to run several next-error
navigations simultaneously. Currently it's possible to visit e.g.
compilation results in one frame, and e.g. grep hits in another frame
at the same time without affecting one another.
Why removes? Each buffer should keep its "current error" state, and
you'd switch between the navigations by switching to the
errors-containing buffer (and calling some additional command), probably.
Undoubtedly, relying
on the frame confines or on the buffer visibility is far from ideal.
I'm not married to buffer visibility, just figured it would be the
easiest to implement. And also, for the user to conceptualize.
If you implement switching between navigations even when all
error-containing buffers are still buried, more power to you.
One solution that I proposed was to associate a window containing
a navigated buffer with its next-error capable buffer, so that
next-error issued in the same window will continue visiting other matches
from the same next-error buffer (regardless whether it's hidden or not).
It's *a* solution, for sure. But there is little about a window that
indicates that an error-containing buffer is tied to it somehow, if it's
not displayed in it.
Implicit state is not so great as a UI.
This assumes there will be a command to disassociate a window
from its next-error buffer, and switch to another next-error buffer.
Do you have a better idea?
Like I said: just adding a command that makes the current buffer the
next-error buffer. The user will have to switch to it, that may be an
extra step, but they'd have to specify the target buffer anyway, so
switching shouldn't make a lot of difference, keystroke-wise.
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Tino Calancha, 2017/10/16
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/10/17
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Tino Calancha, 2017/10/17
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/10/18
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Tino Calancha, 2017/10/20
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/10/20
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Tino Calancha, 2017/10/20
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Juri Linkov, 2017/10/22
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/10/22
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Juri Linkov, 2017/10/23
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Juri Linkov, 2017/10/24
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/10/24
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/10/25
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Juri Linkov, 2017/10/28
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/10/28
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Juri Linkov, 2017/10/29
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/10/30
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/10/30
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/10/30
- bug#28864: 25.3.50; next-error-no-select does select, Juri Linkov, 2017/10/30