bug#18059: 24.3.92; defvar and special variables

[Michael Heerdegen]

Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> writes:

> > Maybe we can be more precise than "current binding form" - "lexical
> > environment" maybe?
>
> Hmm, how would that work?  I don't think "the rest of the lexical
> environment" makes sense.  So maybe
>
>     dynamically bound, until the current lexical environment ends, or
>     file if at top-level.)

Sounds ok.  I don't have any better wording.


Michael.