[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#31191: 26.1; [PATCH] Improve docstring of start-process-shell-comman
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
bug#31191: 26.1; [PATCH] Improve docstring of start-process-shell-command |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:06:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me> writes:
> Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> writes:
>>> +\(fn NAME BUFFER COMMAND)"
>>> (declare (advertised-calling-convention (name buffer command) "23.1"))
>>
>> I think this is redundant since advertised-calling-convention already
>> does the same.
>
> you are right, thank you. I didn't know about that and helpful does not
> take it into account (I've just reported the issue).
>
> What is the preferred way to advertise a signature, the declare form or
> a last line in the docstring? If you answer the question, I can fix the
> manual to add links between (info "(elisp) Declare Form") and (info
> "(elisp) Function Documentation").
The advertised-calling-convention declaration should be used when you
want the old way of calling to trigger a warning during byte
compilation. Otherwise, the docstring method should be used.