[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame |
Date: |
Sun, 06 May 2018 19:49:50 +0300 |
> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 12:28:16 -0400
>
> >> + if (XFRAME (frame)->output_method == output_x_window
>
> Also, I noticed that there is FRAME_X_P for this. I can't find any more
> obvious instances of missing this check, although it's hard to tell in
> many cases if the frame is really guaranteed to have output_x_window has
> the output_method.
Don't we usually signal an error in such cases? Through
check_x_display_info or somesuch?
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2018/05/06
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, martin rudalics, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Noam Postavsky, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/07
- bug#31373: 26.1; frame-list-z-order segfaults on initial daemon frame, Noam Postavsky, 2018/05/07