[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#31718: 26.1; Strange behavior of `cond'
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#31718: 26.1; Strange behavior of `cond' |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2018 16:00:52 -0700 (PDT) |
> You're right, my mistake. Still, I prefer using (cons nil nil) since it's
> cheaper and is a common way to address this issue elsewhere.
Both ways are traditional, the cons-cell one being probably
more typical (and so more recognizable).
In any case, for such a (good, not bad) hack - either one,
a comment is always in order, I think.
- bug#31718: 26.1; Strange behavior of `cond', (continued)
bug#31718: 26.1; Strange behavior of `cond', Paul Eggert, 2018/06/16
bug#31718: 26.1; Strange behavior of `cond', Noam Postavsky, 2018/06/16
bug#31718: 26.1; Strange behavior of `cond', Michael Heerdegen, 2018/06/17