[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E"
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E" |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2018 05:40:41 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:46:52 +0100 (CET)
> Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 33445@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org>
>
> I second that. It might be a small difference to people who are well
> acquainted with Emacs coding systems. However, I believe that Joe
> User would prefer the `U+' notation. (I have a good knowledge of
> coding systems, and even I would prefer to see the `U+' prefix :-)
This is not about coding systems at all. The codepoint is shown at
least twice in the display, just without the U+ prefix.
The display produced by that function is already cluttered beyond
hope, so much so that many important details evade you until you
actually read each and every symbol. Adding the U+ to them (where,
exactly?) would make aa bad situation even worse, for very little
gain.
The proper Unicode name of the character, CRYSTAL BALL, is shown in
the display.
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2018/11/20
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", Eli Zaretskii, 2018/11/20
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2018/11/20
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", Eli Zaretskii, 2018/11/20
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2018/11/20
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", Werner LEMBERG, 2018/11/20
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E",
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", Werner LEMBERG, 2018/11/21
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", Eli Zaretskii, 2018/11/21
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", Werner LEMBERG, 2018/11/21
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", Eli Zaretskii, 2018/11/21
- bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", Eli Zaretskii, 2018/11/20
bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E", 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2018/11/21