bug#34589: 26.1.91; GDB-MI Display Complex Data Types

[Gustaf Waldemarson]

>Yes.  I asked about the first patch because it's small enough to be
> accepted even without legal paperwork.  The second one exceeds the
> limits of that.

Ah, got it. Feel free to review and include it if you find it useful.
If Arm ever get back
to me regarding the legal stuff I'll submit them then as a separate bug.

Den mån 4 mars 2019 kl 04:31 skrev Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>
> > From: Gustaf Waldemarson <gustaf.waldemarson@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 21:32:46 +0100
> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com, 
> > rpluim@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org
> >
> > > Does the first patch have value on its own? If so, we can accept it 
> > > without
> > > legal paperwork.
> >
> > I would argue that either patch have some value. The first patch enables 
> > display
> > of the complex data types and the second changes the interface to use a
> > non-deprecated function from the gdb interface that additionally lists 
> > function
> > arguments as well, something the previous one did not (at least if I have
> > understood the documentation correctly).
> >
> > Although, the first patch in my list is the bigger one. Wasn't that part of 
> > the
> > problem legal-wise?
>
> Yes.  I asked about the first patch because it's small enough to be
> accepted even without legal paperwork.  The second one exceeds the
> limits of that.
>