[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jul 2019 05:30:52 +0300 |
> From: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>
> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 20:36:15 +0200
> Cc: 36729@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, drew.adams@oracle.com
>
> > We already have ls-lisp.el. It isn't used on platforms where 'ls' is
> > available because AFAIK using 'ls' is faster.
>
> Is that is still noticeable on modern systems, or just for very big and/or
> recursive listings?
I think its generally slower. But you can try and see for yourself.
> We can do better, while retaining the old format for those who have grown too
> accustomed to it (not meant as pejorative).
I think switching Dired to a different layout will be so revolutionary
that it warrants a new name, not Dired. People are too accustomed to
that format, not in the least because they also use "ls -l" from the
shell prompt.
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/07/19
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/19
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Stephen Berman, 2019/07/19
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/07/21
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/21
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/07/21
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Drew Adams, 2019/07/21
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/21
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Drew Adams, 2019/07/21
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing, Juri Linkov, 2019/07/26