[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Aug 2019 14:52:13 +0300 |
> From: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>
> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 13:41:03 +0200
> Cc: Philipp Stephani <phst@google.com>,
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, 36879@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> The question is rather, how did this code ever work in the first
> place? As you observed, when XTerm sends the reply, it uses BEL as
> terminator. Emacs uses BEL (C-g) as INTR char, which means that not
> only is special effort required to avoid having it quit the current
> elisp code -- this could have been done using inhibit-quit -- but when
> the pty receives the BEL from XTerm, it immediately discards unread
> characters and raises SIGINT.
You are saying that TTY frames cannot handle inhibit-quit correctly?
- bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/08/03
- bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/08/03
- bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/03
- bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/08/03
- bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/03
- bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/08/03
- bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/03
- bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/08/04
bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Daniel Eklöf, 2019/08/03
bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Daniel Eklöf, 2019/08/03
bug#36879: 26.2; OSC 52 paste in term/xterm.el not working, Stefan Monnier, 2019/08/03