bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#37325: About 'latex-insert/close-block' in 'latex-mode'


From: Sebastian Urban
Subject: bug#37325: About 'latex-insert/close-block' in 'latex-mode'
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:31:05 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

Hello,

in 'latex-mode' (not AUCTeX) there are:

- 'latex-insert-block' (function) & 'tex-latex-block' (alias)
  on 'C-c C-o' and 'C-c C-t';

- 'latex-close-block' (function) & 'tex-close-latex-block' (alias)
  on 'C-c C-e' and 'C-c /' and 'C-c ]'.

1.  Why so many key bindings?  Can we have 'C-c [' for "insert" and
'C-c ]' for "close" - and just that?  When I do 'C-c [' it's
"undefined", so maybe...

2.  When I use 'where-is' on both aliases I get (echo area, 2 lines):

tex-latex-block is not on any key;
 its alias latex-insert-block is on C-c C-t, C-c C-o

If I'm not mistaken, it says that 'latex-insert-block' is an alias for
'tex-latex-block' when it's completely otherwise.  So 2nd line should
rather say:

 it's na alias for latex-insert-block, which is on C-c C-t, C-c C-o

2.1.  Why the one char indent in 2nd line?

3.  In INFO 25.11.2 "LaTeX Editing Commands" for 'C-c C-o' alias
'tex-latex-block' is used and for 'C-c C-e' alias
'tex-close-latex-block' is used - why not real functions names:
'latex-insert-block' and 'latex-close-block'?  They would even sound
better (look at the name of the section).

4.  And then, after all, are those aliases needed at all?


S. U.

GNU Emacs 26.2 (build 1, i686-w64-mingw32) of 2019-04-13





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]