[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:53:23 +0200 |
It's long annoyed med that `C-m' is described thusly by
describe-bindings:
C-c RET Prefix Command
C-c RET C-c mml-secure-message-encrypt
C-c RET C-e mml-secure-message-sign-encrypt
C-c RET C-n mml-unsecure-message
C-c RET C-p Prefix Command
C-c RET C-s mml-secure-message-sign
C-c RET C Prefix Command
C-c RET P mml-preview
C-c RET S Prefix Command
C-c RET b mml-attach-buffer
C-c RET c Prefix Command
I know that `C-m' and RET is the same key binding, but I also think that
when this key is used as a prefix key, I don't think anybody has ever
wanted that to be RET instead of `C-m'.
Or is there a way to distinguish what we mean, somehow?
In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 17, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.5)
of 2019-09-21 built on marnie
Repository revision: c61bfe0a3adab1a9fd0dc283cbf8291a78ed6da1
Repository branch: master
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11902000
System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/22
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/23