[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18378: [Patch] wrong fontification of Java code
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#18378: [Patch] wrong fontification of Java code |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:06:38 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Hello again, Stefan.
Ping?
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 18:09:47 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Stefan.
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 15:13:05 +0100, Stefan Kangas wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> > Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> > > I missed this bug report back in 2014. The code has moved around so
> > > much since then that Jordon's patch no longer applies. But a simple
> > > patch with the same idea appears to fix this bug:
> > Thanks for taking a look.
> > With your fix, applied on the master branch, in the example given:
> > class X
> > {
> > public void x ()
> > {
> > for (int this_is_not_a_function_name : getX ()) {
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > The "int" no longer has font-lock-type-face. Should it?
> That's funny. It has font-lock-type-face for me, in all of emacs-27,
> master and standalone CC Mode (in master). font-lock-type-face is indeed
> correct, here.
> Are you sure you were .... (I don't think I need to fill in the dots for
> you. ;-)
> > Best regards,
> > Stefan Kangas
> --
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- bug#18378: [Patch] wrong fontification of Java code,
Alan Mackenzie <=