[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:18:29 +0100 |
> aaa:; perl -we 'print " " x 9999;' #finishes right away.
> bbb:; perl -we 'print "\n" x 9999;' #takes several seconds, even on the
> latest hardware.
(The comments seem to have been swapped around, but we get the idea.)
This is not a rare edge case. Long lines are not uncommon in compilation
output, and a sluggish M-x compile reflects badly on Emacs since it is a
commonly used function.
The main culprit seems to be 'omake' -- try removing it from
compilation-error-regexp-alist. There is still an annoying delay; further
investigation is needed. (For instance, 'msft' occurs twice; this must be a
mistake.)
- bug#39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2020/02/13
- bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/14
- bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/14
- bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/14
- bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/15
- bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/15
- bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/16
bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2020/02/14
bug#39595: #39595: M-x compile still very line-length weak, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2020/02/16