[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39780: [PATCH] Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the docu
From: |
Štěpán Němec |
Subject: |
bug#39780: [PATCH] Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the documentation |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:58:12 +0100 |
I was at a loss as to why my attempt to set up spam-stat seemed to
have no effect, only to find (digging in the code) that it was
ignoring most of the sample files due to this undocumented variable.
* doc/misc/gnus.texi (Creating a spam-stat dictionary): Document
the variable 'spam-stat-process-directory-age'.
---
doc/misc/gnus.texi | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/misc/gnus.texi b/doc/misc/gnus.texi
index 424e15bc6d..718e269fc8 100644
--- a/doc/misc/gnus.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/gnus.texi
@@ -25668,6 +25668,13 @@ Creating a spam-stat dictionary
file is treated as one non-spam mail.
@end defun
+@defvar spam-stat-process-directory-age
+Maximum age of files to be processed, in days. Without this filter,
+re-training spam-stat with several thousand messages could take a long
+time. The default is 90, but you might want to set this to a bigger
+value during the initial training.
+@end defvar
+
Usually you would call @code{spam-stat-process-spam-directory} on a
directory such as @file{~/Mail/mail/spam} (this usually corresponds to
the group @samp{nnml:mail.spam}), and you would call
--
2.25.1
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#39780: [PATCH] Mention 'spam-stat-process-directory-age' in the documentation,
Štěpán Němec <=